Reversi Benchmark -- Round 2
Finally we got a Woodcrest machine for benchmark. Thanks to CopperBlue again for contributing the machine.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50b73/50b736648ef4731171928fd58ba3eb4759e2d11d" alt=""
The Intel Xeon Dual-Core 2.66GHz (Woodcrest) achieves much better 32bit performance than AMD64X2 4200+ (2.2GHz). Running Woodcrest in 64bit achieves even higher performance.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6151/e61517f88182bb8a3937a8409898849d1d5cfb94" alt=""
Can you believe Woodcrest is even slower than the aging AMD64 X2? I suggest CopperBlue upgrade his Java JVM to 1.5.x. There is significant performance boost in Java 1.5 over Java 1.4. Otherwise, his latest processor is just as slow as my 1+ year-old processor. Do you care?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50b73/50b736648ef4731171928fd58ba3eb4759e2d11d" alt=""
The Intel Xeon Dual-Core 2.66GHz (Woodcrest) achieves much better 32bit performance than AMD64X2 4200+ (2.2GHz). Running Woodcrest in 64bit achieves even higher performance.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6151/e61517f88182bb8a3937a8409898849d1d5cfb94" alt=""
Can you believe Woodcrest is even slower than the aging AMD64 X2? I suggest CopperBlue upgrade his Java JVM to 1.5.x. There is significant performance boost in Java 1.5 over Java 1.4. Otherwise, his latest processor is just as slow as my 1+ year-old processor. Do you care?
2 Comments:
At 10/17/2006 3:55 AM ,
Anonymous said...
I don't suppose you've still got that Woodcrest laying about?
I'd dearly love to see a simple "pystone" test on Woodbridge and Opteron of similar pedigrees, just to get a feel for how a Python application server might fair on one vs the other.
/usr/local/lib/python2.5/test/pystone.py
At 10/17/2006 9:30 AM ,
xman said...
Running the pystone.py is handy. I shall run it on platforms that I have access to, and generate a chart. ;)
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home